Why FacilityOpsIQ
New to the market. Not new to how this should work.
Choosing a newer vendor is a fair thing to scrutinize. So here’s the honest case — no logos we don’t have, no metrics we can’t defend. Just the reasons the model is better, and exactly where we are.
The legacy problem
Most of this software was built before modern AI existed.
The CMMS and enterprise platforms most teams use today were architected a decade or more ago, around forms, tables, and tickets. When AI arrived, it got bolted on — a chatbot in the corner, an "AI summary" button, a feature flag. Useful, but peripheral. The core still just records that a job was marked done.
FacilityOpsIQ started from a different premise: if you were building this today, AI wouldn’t be a feature — it would be the operating layer, and the record it produces would be something you could actually prove. So we built the intelligence and the tamper-evident record into the core from the first line of code.
That’s the whole difference. It’s also why a well-funded incumbent can’t simply catch up by shipping another add-on: verification and AI-native operations aren’t features you retrofit — they’re an architecture.
Why choose us
Six honest reasons — and what each one really means.
AI-first, not retrofitted
Most tools in this space were built a decade ago and had AI stapled on. FacilityOpsIQ was designed around AI and verified outcomes from the first line of code — so the intelligence is in the core, not a sidebar.
AI recommends, you stay in control
Above your confidence threshold, AI acts; below it, it asks. Vendor payouts default to manual approval. You get the automation without giving up the wheel.
You don’t have to rip anything out
Start as the verification and AI layer alongside the systems you already run. Low-risk to try, and it earns its place before it replaces anything.
Deploy in days, not quarters
No six-figure, multi-quarter implementation. Transparent pricing and a setup measured in days lowers the cost of finding out we’re right.
Enterprise controls from day one
SSO (Microsoft, Google, OIDC), two-factor auth, role-based access enforced at the API, database-level tenant isolation with Postgres row-level security, and full audit logging.
Radical transparency
We tell you exactly what’s live, what’s configurable, and what’s on the roadmap — no vaporware. New doesn’t mean unproven engineering; it means you’re early to a better model.
Radical transparency
We’ll tell you exactly where we are.
No vaporware. In a demo we’ll separate what’s live today from what’s configurable and what’s on the roadmap — including the parts that are powerful but optional, like public-blockchain anchoring. You should choose a vendor who’s precise about their own maturity. We try to be.
- SSO with Microsoft, Google, and OIDC
- Two-factor authentication (TOTP) with recovery codes
- Role-based access enforced at the API — not just hidden in the UI
- Database-level tenant isolation with Postgres row-level security, deny-by-default
- Encryption of sensitive data at rest
- Full audit logging with field-level change history
Let us earn it.
The lowest-risk way to evaluate us is to see it on your own operations. Deploy in days, start as an overlay, and let the verified record speak for itself.